Projects and Activities

Descriptions of major course projects are listed here.

Employment Project

During the Employment Project, you will learn strategies for seeking and securing employment or an internship, with particular attention to the documents people normally use to represent themselves and their prospects to potential employers. This project asks you to work individually, but there will also be chances for you to work with your peers to exchange ideas and feedback in your blogs.

project prompt and summary

Locate a real and specific job or internship for which you are qualified and prepare the application materials for it. If you already have a good job, find one that would be an advance for you, then prepare application materials for that position. Step 1 of the project asks you to learn about and use various web-based resources for job seekers and ultimately to select one real job to pursue. Step 2 asks you to prepare the all-important cover letter (i.e., "Job Application Letter"). Step 3 asks you to prepare a print resume suitable for such a position. In Step 4, you will assess your experience in a "Project Assessment Document." In the process of completing each step, you will work closely with your peers and your instructor to shape your writing so that it represents you and your experience fully and effectively.

project goals

This project emphasizes several important goals that all professional writers should bear in mind and that are consistent with those of the Professional Writing Program at Purdue. In the Employment Project, you will learn to shape your writing for very specific situations and purposes:

Writing in Context

  • writing for a range of defined audiences and stakeholders

Project Management

  • Understand, develop and deploy various strategies for planning, researching, drafting, revising, and editing documents both individually and collaboratively.
  • Select and use appropriate technologies that effectively and ethically address professional situations and audiences.
  • Build professional ethos through documentation and accountability.

Document Design
Make rhetorical design decisions about workplace documents, including

  • understanding and adapting to genre conventions and audience expectations
  • understanding and implementing design principles of format and layout
  • drafting, researching, testing, and revising visual designs and information architecture

Teamwork
Learn and apply strategies for successful teamwork and collaboration, such as

  • working online with colleagues

Research
Understand and use various research methods to produce professional documents, including

  • analyzing professional contexts

deliverables

Step 1: Skills Inventory, Job Description and Job Ad Analysis . Start this step by completing the Job Search Activity 12-1 (p. 221) in The Thomson Handbook. In a blog post, respond to each of the questions with a few sentences, or a list. Then, using the resources listed on page 222 of The Thomson Handbook ("Using Print, Campus and Internet Resources"), find two job ads, produce an exact copy of each, then select one that you would apply for. Put the ads in a blog post. Then do some analysis and reflection, In a separate blog entry respond to the Job Ad Analysis form. Your skills inventory, job announcement, job ad analysis response, and cover note should all be posted by the dates listed on the course calendar.

Step 2: Job Application Letter. The job application letter is critical to your efforts to secure a job, perhaps as critical as your resume itself. For Project 1, your letter should be no longer than one or two pages (one is preferable in most cases), following the suggestions and models discussed during class. You should submit the draft of your application letter to your blog for peer review by midnight on ________. Your letter should be attached to a blog post that includes a cover note that follows guidelines for Eliciting Good Response and the PDF version of the letter. (Read these directions for converting your documents to PDF format if you have any questions about the process.) Use the tag "Job Application letter." See the Calendar for Week 3 for additional details. Review the sample in The Thomson Handbook, p 225. Your letter should be context-specific and should contain the required five parts (heading, greeting, opening, persuasion, closing) in the format shown.

Step 3: Print-Based Resume. Your printable resume (one or more pages in length, depending upon the type of job and the depth of your experience) should adapt features drawn from the samples discussed in class or available for review at the Online Writing Lab. It's critical that you shape your resume to the specific job or internship you have chosen to apply for (that it's suited to the context), so be sure to include only the relevant aspects of your professional experience. As in the Job Application Letter, your writing needs to be error-free, concise, and presented in an easily readable format. Draft due for peer review: ________ by midnight. Your resume draft should be posted to your blog as a PDF attachment to a blog message that explains the nature of the attachment and invites peer feedback. Read these directions for converting your documents to PDF format if you have any questions about the process. You should also review the principles, guidelines, and resume samples in The Thomson Handbook (Chapter 12, pages 226-232). Pay special attention to the Project Checklist "Evaluating Your Resume's Content" and "Evaluating Your Resume's Design" on pages 228-229. Ask yourself these questions as you prepare your final draft.

Step 4: Project Assessment Document: As you near the end of your work on the Employment Project (and no later than ________, prepare a 500-word overview and analysis of your deliverables and the process you used to complete them. Your Project Assessment Document should answer most of the following questions, each of which is tied to the major goals of the assignment:

Writing in Context
How did the particular job you applied for affect how you wrote your letter? Did it change or affect how you presented yourself? How did applying for this position help you understand aspects of your experience you might need to develop more?

Project Management
What was the most challenging document to produce and why? Briefly describe and explain one of the significant revisions you made to this document after your initial draft.

How well did you plan your work on this project? What might you have done differently?

Research
Which research resource proved to be the most beneficial for you? The least? Explain. What did you learn about the particular job field before composing your application letter?

Teamwork
What was one way that peer feedback helped you improve your work? How did responding to the work of others help you improve your own work?

Document Design
What is the most effective aspect of your deliverables in terms of presentation or design? Have you deliberately adapted a standard form in an unusual or creative way? If so, why?

Your Project Assessment Document is due when you turn in your completed Employment Project on ___________ by midnight.

Completing Your Project: By _________, post to your blog a cover note for your final drafts of your cover letter and resume. Your cover note should include links to your Step 1 and Step 4 documents as well. Read these directions for converting your documents to PDF format if you have any questions about the process.

grading

The Employment Project is worth 25% of your course grade. The breakdown for each of its components is as follows: Step 1: Inventory and Job Ad Analysis (20%); Step 2: Job Application Letter (30%); Step 3: Print Resume (30%); Step 4: Project Assessment Document (20%).

grading criteria

When grading your project, your instructor will pay particular attention to see whether you have effectively adapted your documents to the job for which you have applied. Your writing will need to be precise, accurate, and well-suited to the context (the job/field) and to the rhetorical occasion (in terms of tone, style, and content). In this case, a generic, catch-all resume and cover letter will not satisfy the requirements of the project.

revision

You will have opportunities to revise your work throughout the process and will be permitted to revise once again after receiving your grade on the project, subject to these restrictions: 1) Your revision should be substantial (a few fixes alone are not enough to raise a grade); 2) you turn in your completed revision within one week of the date it was returned to you with a grade; 3) you include submission notes that specify precisely what you did to improve your work, including whether or not you made use of the OWL's online or on-site tutoring.

Job Ad Analysis

Before you decide on a job ad, make sure that it provides you with sufficient information about the ideal candidate for the company or organization. A primary objective of this assignment is to tailor your employment documents to the specific needs of the employer. If your ad does not give you sufficient information about your potential employer’s needs, the objective of the project is defeated before you have even begun. If you are uncertain whether or not your job ad is appropriate, do not hesitate to ask.

For this assignment, you must have a keen awareness of what your potential employer needs in an applicant, and you must create a professional identity that proves you can fulfill and exceed these expectations.

Some answers require a paragraph of 4-6 sentences while others require a short answer or a list. The short answer will be a sentence or two. The list will be a list of keywords or terms. See parentheses after each question to know if you should respond with a paragraph, short answer, or list. Ultimately, these paragraphs will make it easier to draft and complete your job application letter, as well as your resume.

Reflection

1. Why did you choose this job ad? Do you feel that you are qualified for the position? (paragraph)

2. How long has the ad been posted? If it has been posted for a long period of time, are you sure that the position is still available? How? (short answer)

3. Where is the company located? Are you willing to move if it is out of state or in a foreign country? (short answer)

4. Why is living in the area that the company is located appealing to you? (paragraph)

Job Ad Analysis

1. What skills is your prospective employer seeking, from most important to least important? (list)

2. What exceptional skills do you have that prove you to be
invaluable to this company or organization? Remember that your resume is not a record of what you’ve done, but a persuasive document that proves indisputably that you are the best person for the job. (list)

3. As an exercise, list the skills, professional experience, personality traits, etc., the job ad is asking for in the left column, and in the right, write paragraphs that elaborate on and illustrate your skills, experience, etc.

Your prospective employer (list) You (paragraphs)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

History of the Company / Organization

1. Did you know anything about the company before you saw the job ad? (short answer)

2. Does the company have a website? What is the URL? (short answer)

3. What is the mission statement of the company? (paragraph)

4. What are keywords on the website that you can use in your cover letter and interview? (list)

5. Write a few sentences about the history of the company. Remember that it is essential for you to learn as much about the company as possible; you can use such knowledge for your cover letter and interview. (paragraph)

6. Based on your research, what is your personal sense about the company? What do you feel the company values? (paragraph)

7. Does Purdue’s Center for Career Opportunities have a networking system with this company? (short answer)

8. Do you have any personal connections to this company? Do you know anyone who works there? Does anyone in your family or friends of your family work there? (short answer)

Peer Review of Job Application Letters

  1. Using the blogs display, take a look through the job application letters everyone posted to their weblog. (You can see all the drafts by clicking on the keyword "Job Application Letter" at the bottom of one of the posts.) Choose two and post a comment to each that you will be responding to his or her application letter drafts. In choosing two, try to pick ones that have not received any responses or notices that someone is responding.
  2. Then, compose a detailed response for each that carefully addresses all of the questions below and tries also to address the writer's concerns. If you have additional suggestions for response not covered by the questions below, the writer would certainly appreciate the feedback; however, you are still responsible for addressing all of the listed questions.
  3. When finished, post each response as a comment to the weblog posts you are responding to.

In composing your response, you might find it easier to first just to go through and address all the questions on a sheet of paper or in a document file. Your tone should be informal but professional and not overly casual. A friendly voice in feedback is good; many writer's are more comfortable at accepting cricitism of their work when it come from a good-natured, sympathetic responder.

Also, when talking about specific areas of the author's text, be sure to include specific quotation within your feedback. Take advantage of the fact that you can easily copy and paste to point directly to what you are referring to from the draft. (Try using Firefox or Safari's "tabbed browsing" to keep multiple windows easily available during this type of peer review.).

Form and Style

  1. Does the letter include all the necessary components (return address, header, salutation, introductory paragraph, body paragraph(s), and conclusion)? If not, what’s missing?
  2. Does the writer use block format (all text flush with the left margin)?
  3. Does the style of the letter suit the occasion? Is it too informal? Too formal or generic? Explain.
  4. Does the writer take the right tone? (E.g., come off as enthusiastic without gushing? highly qualified without bragging?) Explain.
  5. Are there any spelling or mechanical errors? If so, identify them, either by listing them here or by circling them on a printed draft.

Content/Rhetorical Context

  1. Does the letter speak directly and specifically to the job ad, using keywords to organize the discussion of his or her qualifications? Even if it does, what could be done better?
  2. Does the writer mention specific reasons why he or she has applied for the position? Explain.
  3. Does the writer identify specific skills, using terminology that other experienced people would recognize?
  4. Does the introductory paragraph identify the position applied for, its source, and then the major reason(s) why the writer is well-suited?
  5. Does the conclusion say how the writer can be contacted for further discussion or an interview? Does the letter end on a high note? Explain.
  6. What is the most important revision the writer should make? Explain.

Peer Review of Resumes

  1. Using the blogs display, take a look through the job application letters everyone posted to their weblog. Choose two and post a comment to each that you will be responding to his or her resume drafts. In choosing two, try to pick ones that have not received any responses or notices that someone is responding.
  2. Then, compose a detailed response for each that carefully addresses all of the questions below and tries also to address the writer's concerns. If you have additional suggestions for response not covered by the questions below, the writer would certainly appreciate the feedback; however, you are still responsible for addressing all of the listed questions.
  3. When finished, post each response as a comment to the weblog posts you are responding to.

In composing your response, you might find it easier to first just to go through and address all the questions on a sheet of paper or in a document file. Your tone should be informal but professional and not overly casual. A friendly voice in feedback is good; many writer's are more comfortable at accepting cricitism of their work when it come from a good-natured, sympathetic responder.

Also, when talking about specific areas of the author's text, be sure to include specific quotation within your feedback. Take advantage of the fact that you can easily copy and paste to point directly to what you are referring to from the draft. (Try using Firefox or Safari's "tabbed browsing" to keep multiple windows easily available during this type of peer review.).

Questions for Response

  1. What can the writer do to make the resume better tailored to the specific job being applied for?
  2. Is the layout and design pleasing to the eye? Make at least one suggestion for improving it.
  3. Does the resume fit comfortably within the page (as opposed to being squished in or stretched out)? What can the writer do to improve it?
  4. Is it easily readable (no confusing fonts, clearly marked sections)? What improvements can be made?
  5. Does it use typography (including headers and bold and italics) appropriately and effectively?
  6. Is the most important information located on the left side of the page and near the top whenever possible? Identify at least one part that could be better placed.
  7. Does the content of the resume support the objective (if there is one)? Explain.
  8. Is the resume too short? Where can it elaborate? Job skills? Responsibilities? Education?
  9. Is material sequenced in order of importance and relevance?
  10. Do bulleted items begin with action verbs? Are list items ordered in terms of importance?
  11. Does the resume avoid generalities and focus on specific information and professional terminology?
  12. Does the resume pass the Quadrant, Column, Squint, and Distance tests? Explain how the author might make improvements based on your test results.
  13. What other observations can you make about the resume?

White Paper Project

The focus of Project 2 is the white paper, a common report genre in the professional world. White papers are used in business, industrial, and governmental contexts to sum up the gist of what’s known about a subject. During this project you will learn about

  • the white paper genre through collaborative creation of a white paper.
  • new writing and communication technologies that support technical writing in college and industry, with attention to open source and other freely available software or writing spaces (online networks, blogging, etc.)
  • collaboration, project management, and strategies for writing and revising.
  • producing a text for the web in HTML that integrates visual content, such as screenshots, tables, and flowcharts

At the beginning of this project, you will be placed by your instructor into a group with fellow students. Each of the major components of this project will be completed in collaboration with group members. Individuals must also keep a project log at their course blog following these guidelines. Everyone will also be asked to email a peer collaborative evaluation form (Word format) independently to the instructor when Project 2 is due. To find out more about the purpose and form of white papers, review the discussion in The Thomson Handbook, Chapter 12, "Writing for Business and the Workplace" (pp. 235-36).

Discussion

Learning about the genre of white papers. You'll spend some time in the early part of the project reading sample white papers and about new writing and communication technologies so that you can get comfortable with the genre and the general topic. You will see that although you may not be familiar with all of these new technologies (or things like "open source") yet, you'll learn about it quickly. In fact, you already know much more about it than you realize since this English 421Y website uses Drupal, which is itself open source software. (You may be viewing it in Firefox, also an open source project.) The point of the white paper genre is to represent the critically important information about a specific topic (such as a technology), not to argue, sell, or promote (though those may be ancillary purposes)

Rhetorical Situation: The primary audience for your writing will consist of peers and other technical writing experts interested in finding out how new writing technologies can help their organizations in college or the workplace. A subsidiary audience is other people interested in these new technologies (the early adopters in the public sphere), even entrepreneurs who may see (or desire) new applications for these technologies for business, education, and enterprise purposes. The purpose of your white paper writing should be to provide essential and accurate background information and sources on a specifci topic for interested readers so that they are well informed and ready to make up their minds about the value or usefulness of a technology.

Writing That Matters : Students whose work focuses on open source software or technologies may be able to publish their work at the Open Source Development and Documentation Project. If your work focuses on writing and communication technologies, we will encourage you to submit your work to the professional writing program for showcasing on our resources website for subsequent use by future students, instructors, and the public. Your projects will also form the basis of your work for Project 3.

Project Goals

This project emphasizes several important goals that all professional writers should bear in mind and that are consistent with those of the Professional Writing Program at Purdue.

Writing in Context

  • Write to the different levels of technical expertise of a range of audiences and stakeholders to foster technical understanding.
  • Understand the ethical implications of working within the nexus of technology and culture.

Project Management

  • Understand, develop and deploy various strategies for planning, researching, drafting, revising, and editing documents both individually and collaboratively.
  • Select and use appropriate technologies that effectively and ethically address professional situations and audiences.

Document Design
Make rhetorical design decisions about technical documents including

  • understanding and adapting to genre conventions and expectations of a range of audiences including both technical and non-technical audiences
  • understanding and implementing design principles of format and layout
  • ensuring the technical accuracy of visual content

Teamwork
Learn and apply strategies for successful teamwork, such as

  • working online with colleagues to determine roles and responsibilities
  • managing team conflicts constructively
  • responding constructively to peers' work
  • soliciting and using peer feedback effectively
  • achieving team goals

Research
Understand and use the research methods and strategies necessary to the production of professional documents, including

  • locating, evaluating, and using print and online information selectively for particular audiences and purposes
  • triangulating sources of evidence

Technology
Use and evaluate the writing technologies frequently used in the workplace, such as emailing, instant messaging, image editing, video editing, presentation design and delivery, HTML editing, Web browsing, content management, and desktop publishing technologies.

Deliverables

  1. Project proposal. Each group will do preliminary research, come up with an original topic, and submit their proposal as a "story" at our course website for class discussion and feedback.
  2. Project logs. Each group member will keep a weekly project log on their individual weblog. See the guidelines for project logs.
  3. Research posts. Each individual group member will, in coordination with the rest of the group, research in depth the group's topic and post their notes to their individual weblogs on the course website. For the research posts, everyone in the group should agree to use a common tag for the category (e.g., "Research on Google Docs")
  4. Annotated bibliography. At the end of the research phase, the group will assemble a short annotated bibliography (including 6 critical sources) and compile and post the bibliography to a member's blog and tagged so that it shows up with the group's project documents (e.g., tag = Group 3 White Paper Project)
  5. White paper drafts and revisions . The group is responsible for the timely creation of two drafts of the white paper. The first draft of your white paper should be 2,000-3,000 words + the annotated bibliography. Following the first draft, you will receive further instructions for a revision assignment for creating the final draft. As you revise your white paper, you will work from global concerns (e.g., content development and organization) toward local concerns (proofreading and editing), with peer review focused on the major concerns at each stage of the revision. The final draft of your white paper should
    • Demonstrate a good knowledge of the white paper genre.
    • Be rhetorically sensitive to the needs of the primary and subsidiary audiences.
    • Be well argued and supported by research.
    • Be carefully and fully cited and include a references section, in addition to the annotated bibliography.
    • Contain a consistent voice and style throughout.
    • Be free of proofreading and editing problems.
    • Follow the stylistic conventions for professional writing and writing for the web as covered in the course readings and discussion.
    • Be presented in HTML format and include relevant visual content to teach as well as illustrate concepts and information.
  6. Peer Collaboration Evaluation Form. At the end of the project, each group member will provide a detailed evaluation of all of the group's members and submit the form to the instructor.

Collaboration

Successful collaboration will be a critical component of this project. Follow guidelines for successful collaboration as described in The Thomson Handbook (see and discussed in other course readings and messages. To summarize, you should

  • Work collaboratively with the rest of the group in researching and drafting a white paper, including participating in any online group meetings and providing deliverables in a timely manner in the requested format.
  • Follow good professional communication practices, especially in project and issue logs
  • CC all group members on any email communication regarding the project (including contacting the instructor, unless of a personal nature).
  • When assigned, provide detailed feedback to other groups on their projects/drafts.
  • Conduct oneself in a professional manner in all group communication and when giving feedback to other groups.

Grading

Your individual grade for this project will be based the work produced by your team and the quality of your contribution to the project, as determined by your project evaluation forms and project logs. Project 2 is worth 20% of your overall course grade.

Supporting Readings from the Thomson Handbook

  • Chapter 7, "Understanding Academic Genres" (123)
  • Chapter 8, "Reading Critically" (131)
  • Chapter 12, "Writing for Business and the Workplace" (217)
  • Chapter 15, "Online Research" (289)
  • Chapter 16, "Library and Field Research" (315)
  • Chatper 17, "Using Information Effectively" (337)
  • Chapter 18, "Research and Plagiarism in the Digital Age" (357)
  • Chapters 19 and 20 (MLA and APA style) (377 and 443)
  • Chapter 24, "Using Visuals to Inform and Persuade" (557)
  • Chapter 29, "Writing and Rhetoric on the Web" (641)
  • Chapter 30, "Designing Simple Web Pages" (659)
  • Chapter 31, "Designing Complex Websites" (681)

Usability Study and User Documentation in Multimedia

For Project 3, you will work collaboratively in project teams on a client-based service-learning project that teaches you to manage complex writing challenges in real contexts that matter. You will learn principles of project management, collaboration, document cycling, usability testing and study, and client-based research. Because you will work with real clients--either in the community or online, you will also learn important principles of professional and ethical communication. The goal will be to start with the White Paper Projects produced already this semester and then, after user-testing and usability study, produce a user-guide that teaches a critical and (perhaps) complex application of the technology to an interested client. You will begin the project by thinking of and contacting clients who may benefit from having such your report, which will consist of several components, including a short multmedia, web-based presentation. For some background reading and context, review Chapter 29, "Writing and Rhetoric on the Web" (641) in The Thomson Handbook, which presents some information on usability and accessibility issues. See especially the "Accessibility and Usability Resources" on page 658.

Discussion

Learning about usability studies: You'll spend some time in the early part of the project reading about usability studies and why they're useful for testing and user documentation, in addition to the development and design process in any industry.

Building on the past: You'll use the white papers produced for Project 2 as your starting point and then select your topic as some specific aspect (use) related to it. For example, if a white paper focuses on Google Docs, you might propose conducting a usability study and producing user documentation for using that tool for collaboration in technical writing context, or about how to use Google Docs to produce good PDF files. Those white papers will give you a base to build on.

Rhetorical Situation: The primary audience for your writing will consist of client whom you contact at the outset of your project. Your goal is to produce user documentation, conduct a usability study, and then package and submit everything to the client as a report by the end of the project. You may also receive permission to include the white paper project that was your starting point. A subsidiary audience is other people interested in these new technologies (the early adopters in the public sphere), even entrepreneurs who may see (or desire) new applications for these technologies for business, education, and enterprise purposes.

Writing That Matters : As with Project 2, students whose work focuses on open source software or technologies may be able to publish their work at the Open Source Development and Documentation Project. If the work focuses on writing and communication technologies, we will encourage you to submit your work to the professional writing program for showcasing on our resources website for subsequent use by future students, instructors, and the public.

Project Goals

This project emphasizes several important goals that all professional writers should bear in mind and that are consistent with those of the Professional Writing Program at Purdue.

Writing in Context

  • Analyze the invention, manufacture, and distribution of technologies in context and use writing to communicate these attributes in a variety of media and genres.
  • Write to the different levels of technical expertise of a range of audiences and stakeholders to foster technical understanding.
  • Understand the ethical implications of working within the nexus of technology and culture.

Project Management

  • Understand, develop and deploy various strategies for planning, researching, drafting, revising, and editing documents both individually and collaboratively.
  • Build professional ethos through documentation and accountability.

Document Design

  • understanding and implementing design principles of format and layout
  • interpreting and arguing with design
  • drafting, researching, testing, revising visual design and information architecture
  • ensuring the technical accuracy of visual content

Teamwork
Learn and apply strategies for successful teamwork, such as

  • working online with colleagues to determine roles and responsibilities
  • managing team conflicts constructively
  • responding constructively to peers' work
  • soliciting and using peer feedback effectively
  • achieving team goals

Research
Understand and use the research methods and strategies necessary to the production of professional documents, including

  • working ethically with research participants, subject matter experts, and technical experts
  • locating, evaluating, and using print and online information selectively for particular audiences and purposes
  • selecting appropriate primary research methods such as interviews, observations, focus groups, and surveys to collect data
  • applying concepts of usability research, such as user-centered design

Technology
Use and evaluate the writing technologies frequently used in the workplace, such as emailing, instant messaging, image editing, video editing, presentation design and delivery, HTML editing, Web browsing, content management, and desktop publishing technologies.

Deliverables

  1. Project proposal. Each group will do preliminary research on the available white paper topics already submitted, then propose a focus for their usability study and user documentation. The goal will be to submit a proposal as a "story" at our course website for class discussion and feedback. Your proposal should include client information.
  2. Project logs. Each group member will keep a weekly project log on their individual weblog. See the guidelines for project logs.
  3. Design and conduct a usability study. Build upon the models provided to create 1) individually generated usability studies, posted to individual blogs and tagged appropriately (e.g., "Group 3 Usability"); a compiled usability report that take each member's experiences/data and pulls them together to draw some conclusions.
  4. User documentation. Using the usability research in Step 3, decide on the focus for the user documentation that the group will produce. Post the topic proposal/focus as a story to allow for group feedback. Make sure your topic is very tightly focused since good user documentation is highly detailed (if your focus is too broad, you're documentation will be too long to produce given our time constraints). In this step, you'll produce two drafts. The first draft will be text-only and no visuals. In the second draft, you'll incorporate visual content to support the textual content.
  5. Short multimedia presentation for Web delivery. Use PowerPoint, Keynote, Captivate, or Connect to create short movie that would stand-in as viewable documentation. Adobe Captivate is available in Purdue labs. You also have access (from anywhere) to Adobe Connect, which is useful for capturing screen movements as a Flash movie.
  6. Peer Collaboration Evaluation Form. At the end of the project, each group member will provide a detailed evaluation of all of the group's members and submit the form to the instructor.

Collaboration

Successful collaboration will be a critical component of this project. Follow guidelines for successful collaboration as described in The Thomson Handbook (see and discussed in other course readings and messages. To summarize, you should

  • Work collaboratively with the rest of the group in researching and drafting a white paper, including participating in any online group meetings and providing deliverables in a timely manner in the requested format.
  • Follow good professional communication practices, especially in project and issue logs
  • CC all group members on any email communication regarding the project (including contacting the instructor, unless of a personal nature).
  • When assigned, provide detailed feedback to other groups on their projects/drafts.
  • Conduct oneself in a professional manner in all group communication and when giving feedback to other groups.

Grading

Your individual grade for this project will be based the work produced by your team and the quality of your contribution to the project, as determined by your project evaluation forms and project logs. Project 2 is worth 25% of your overall course grade.

Supporting Readings from the Thomson Handbook

  • Chapter 7, "Understanding Academic Genres" (123)
  • Chapter 10, "Reading Images Critically" (175)
  • Chapter 12, "Writing for Business and the Workplace" (217)
  • Chapters 19 and 20 (MLA and APA style) (377 and 443)
  • Chapter 24, "Using Visuals to Inform and Persuade" (557)
  • Chapter 29, "Writing and Rhetoric on the Web" (641)
  • Chapter 30, "Designing Simple Web Pages" (659)
  • Chapter 31, "Designing Complex Websites" (681)
  • Chapter 32, "Multimedia Composing" (705)