I feel like this time’s reading mostly reinforces the ideas from the last reading of to read critically and to interact with the text. I found it kind of interesting how it pointed out that we need to read the texts as an argument whether if the paper is an argumentative essay, written for entertainment, or to inform. It then further emphasized on the importance for the readers to identify the author’s intensions and match them with us reader’s expectations. In closing, I do think this reading is useful, but perhaps just not as useful as the last piece since it mostly only briefly went over the critical reading skills introduced from last time.