This course guide contains all of the materials for this class. To see all of the contents of this guide on one page, click on the "printer-friendly version" link below.
Welcome to ENGL 106 First Year Composition
You can visit ICaP website for further information:
http://www.digitalparlor.org/icap
"Read, read, read. Read everything- trash, classics, good and bad, and see how they do it. Just like a carpenter who works as an apprentice and studies the master. Read! You'll absorb it. Then write." William Faulkner
Course Policy
Follow the links at the bottom of this page for a schedule of assignments for each week this semester. Within each week, you will find daily listings of assignments. Each bullet point for the day is a different task for you to complete. Unless specifically noted otherwise, all assignments are to be completed before class on the day listed.
This course calendar may be updated throughout the semester. I'll notify you about any major changes, but you are still responsible for keeping up with the current schedule.
IMPORTANT: You must visit all of the links provided within the course calendar. There are many links to follow and read. Make sure you visit all of them. Some links provide easy access to other parts of the class site which will help you in your assignments. Some links are to required readings. Others provide you with detailed instructions on completing the assignments. Eventually, you may come to know the instructions which supplement assignments that are repeated throughout the course, but it's still a good idea to continue to revisit the instructions to make sure that you are satisfying all of the requirements.
Assignments and readings for Week 1
Monday, Jan 7th
Introduction to ENGL 106
Course policies and syllabus
Wednesday, Jan 9th
Composing Designing Advocating
What is literacy map/narrative?
Readings: CDA pp. 1-23
Conferences
What do we write? Why do we write?
Friday, Jan 11th
Diagnostics
Course website
Readings: The Plaintiff Speaks CDA pp. 476-491 http://clarissasligh.com/essays/plaintiff.html
Assignments: Small Assignment #1 Pick one (or more) of the questions at the margins of the essay in CDA and answer the question(s).
Assignments and readings for Week 2
Monday, Jan 14 2008
Rhetorical Situation: Audience, Context, Purpose
Analyzing Literacy Narratives/visual maps
Writing a narrative: concepts
Readings: CDA pp. 23-56
Assignments: Journal #1
Wednesday, Jan 16 2008
Prewriting strategies
Revising editing proofreading
Readings: Little Brown pp. 1-38
Conferences
Questions about literacy narrative/visual
Werewolves in Their Youth discussion
Readings: Werewolves in their Youth
Friday, Jan 18 2008
Word commenting function
Openmind
Literacy Narrative peer review
Assignments: Literacy Narrative/visual map 1st drafts
Assignments and readings for Week 3
Monday, Jan 21 2008
Official University Holiday
Wednesday, Jan 23 2008
Writing introductions and conclusions
Basic Paragraphing
What is Profile?
Dominant impression
Organization strategies
Analyzing sample profiles
Readings: CDA pp. 57-78 Little Brown pp. 38-53
Assignments: Literacy Narrative/visual final draft
Conferences
Questions about profile assignment
Friday, Jan 25 2008
Online research
Prewriting for Profile
Assignments: Journal #2
Assignments and readings for Week 4
Monday, Jan 28 2008
Doing research for Profile
Interviews
Brainstorming possible interview questions
Readings: CDA pp. 256-258 Little Brown pp. 396-397
Wednesday, Jan 30 2008
supporting dominant impression
common student errors
Assignments: Small Assignment #2 Find and evaluate a profile and write what the dominant impression is and how does the author support this dominant impression
Conferences
Feedback Literacy Narrative
Friday, Feb 01 2008
Profile 1st peer review
Assignments: Profile 1st drafts
Assignments and readings for Week 5
Monday, Feb 04 2008
How to make arguments
Ethos, pathos, logos
Readings: CDA pp. 79-108
Wednesday, Feb 06 2008
Rhetorical Analysis
Design Plan for Profile
Assignments: Journal #3
Conferences
Revising 1st drafts
Dominant impression
Friday, Feb 08 2008
Profile 2nd peer review
Assignments: Profile 2nd drafts
Assignments and readings for Week 6
Monday, Feb 11 2008
What is Public Document?
Advocacy and argument
Readings: CDA pp. 111-142
Assignments: Profile Final draft
Wednesday, Feb 13 2008
Public Document Guidelines
Analyzing Public Documents
Readings: Little Brown pp. 127-138 CDA pp.329-346
Assignments: Reflection #1
Conferences
Prewriting and design plan for Public Document
Friday, Feb 15 2008
Evaluating Public Documents
Researching for Public Documents
Assignments: Small Assignment #3 Analyze the visual designs of CDA's and Werewolves in their Youth's cover pages.
Assignments and readings for Week 7
Monday, Feb 18 2008
Overview
Wednesday, Feb 20 2008
Visual Design
Visual rhetoric
Readings: CDA pp. 263-313 Little Brown p. 104-114
Assignments: Small Assignment #4 Pick an add, a poster, a book cover, or a photograph and analyze the visual design. Do not forget to add the material you analyzed, and to use the concepts we learned in class.
Conferences
DLC Publisher workshop
We are meeting in the DLC. All students must come to DLC at 12:30
Friday, Feb 22 2008
Public Document 1st peer review
Assignments: Public Document 1st draft
Assignments and readings for Week 8
Monday, Feb 25 2008
Common errors profile assignment
Werewolves in Their Youth Discussion
Readings: Werewolves In Their Youth, Spikes, and In the Black Mill
Assignments: Small Assignment #5 (Blog entry #1)
Wednesday, Feb 27 2008
Werewolves in Their Youth Discussion
Assignments: Journal #4
Small Assignment #5 (Blog entry #2)
Conferences
Feedback on profile assignments
Friday, Feb 29 2008
Public Document 2nd peer review
Assignments: Public Document 2nd draft
Small Assignment #5 (Response)
bold">
Monday, March 3 2008
What is annotated bibliography?
Readings: Little Brown pp. 69-104 CDA pp. 143-176
Assignments: Public Document Final draft
Wednesday, March 5 2008
Analyzing annotated bibliography samples
Assignments: Reflection #2
Conferences
Field trip to the libraries
Friday, March 7 2008
Library Search Workshop
Spring Break No Classes
Assignments and activities for Week 11
Monday, March 17 2008
Summarizing, Evaluating, and reflecting on sources
MLA and APA styles
Wednesday, March 19 2008
Library search workshop
We all meet in DLC in the room we had Publisher workshop
Assignments: bring at least 2 questions you want to ask to the librarian who will be our guest speaker. I will collect the questions at the end of the class.
Conferences
Questions about the annotated bibliography
Friday, March 21 2008
Annotated Bibliography 1st peer review
presentation on reading by Derek
Assignments: Annotated Bibliography 1st drafts
Assignments and readings for Week 12
Monday, March 24 2008
Summarizing sources
Evaluating sources
Reflecting on sources
Wednesday, March 26 2008
APA and MLA
plagiarism
Class discussion on The Challenge of College Readiness
Assignments: Small assignment #6 Write down the differences between scholarly journals and magazines. Go to the library grab a magazine (undergraduate Library) and a scholarly journal (humanities Library) and find the differences. Use the transitional words for comparison such as on the other hand, in contrast, compared to etc.
Readings: The Challenge of College Readiness by David T. Conley Educational Leadership April 2007
Conferences
Questions about the annotated bibliography. Please come with questions.
Friday, March 28 2008
Peer review for the annotated bibliography
Assignments: Annotated Bibliography 2nd draft
Assignments and readings for Week 13
Monday, March 31st 2008
What is research Paper?
Plagiarism
Writing the Research Paper
Readings: Little Brown pp. 427-429
Assignments: Journal #5
Wednesday, Apr 2nd 2008
Class cancelled
I will be in New York for a conference
Conferences
Questions about annotated bibliography
Tuesday group must see me during my office hours or make an appointment
Friday, Apr 4th 2008
Plagiarism
Assignments: Annotated Bibliography Final draft (you have time until 9th of April)
Reflection #3
Assignments and readings for Week 14
Monday, Apr 7th 2008
Anatomy of Research Papers
Assignments: Small Assignment #7 Outline and summarize a scholarly journal article which is related to your major. Do not forget to bring the article with you.
Readings: Little Brown pp. 97-104
Wednesday, Apr 9th 2008
Summarizing, quoting, and paraphrasing
In text citation
Readings: Little Brown pp. 406-418
Conferences
Questions about research paper
Friday, Apr 11th 2008
1st peer review Research paper
Assignments: Research Paper 1st draft
Assignments and readings for Week 15
Monday, Apr 14th 2008
Oral modes of communication
Effective presentation guidelines
2nd peer review Research Paper
Readings: CDA pp. 223-261 except readings and interview section Little Brown pp. 123-127
Assignments: Research Paper 2nd draft
We are meeting in Stanley Coulter Hall room 283
Wednesday, Apr 16th 2008
Presentations: We are meeting in Stanley Coulter Hall room 283
Conferences
Feedback on Annotated Bibliography
Friday, Apr 18th 2008
Presentations
Tuesday, April 15th
Michael Chabon will be giving a reading, free and open to the Public, at 8:00 pm in Loeb Playhouse. He will be signing books after the reading, and books will be available for purchase (cash or check).
Assignments and readings for Week 16
Monday, Apr 21st
Presentations: We are meeting in Stanley Coulter Hall room 283
Wednesday, Apr 23rd
Presentations: We are meeting in Stanley Coulter Hall room 283
Conferences
Typical writing mistakes
Friday, Apr 25th
PresentationsCourse evaluation
Assignments: Research Paper Final Draft
Reflection #4
Papers
"In conversation you can use timing, a look, an inflection. But on the page all you have is commas, dashes, the amount of syllables in a word. When I write, I read everything out loud to get the right rhythm." Fran Lebowitz
Literacy Narrative with a Visual Map
Student samples
Tips for Literacy Narrative
Tips for Literacy Map
Tips for Finding Your Topic
Profile
Design plan for profile assignment
Revision and peer review checklist
Wrote an engaging introduction using one of the introduction strategies in little brown
Does the author provide some background information about the subject? Do you think the subject is introduced well?
Are all your questions answered in the profile? Is there anything else that you would like to see in this profile?
Created a dominant impression of the subject. Mark the dominant impression. Do you think this is an interesting dominant impression?
Used some or all of the typical profile elements (physical description, quotes from or about the subject, examples, anecdotes, factual information)
Created a multifaceted portrait by using different perspectives from different sources
Clearly attributed research from direct observation, interviews, and print and electronic sources. Does any one of these dominate the paper? If yes, how can the paper be more balanced?
Is the profile well organized?
Clearly addressed the assignment
Is there any part that is not relevant to the dominant impression?
Limited or eliminated the use of the first person (I)
Provided clear transitions for the reader
Concluded with a lingering image of your subject using the conclusion strategies in little brown.
What do you think about the visual design (for example, photographs) of the profile?
Comments on the design plan
Comments on the first draft
What are the strengths of the profile?
How can the profile be improved?
interview
samples
Would you like to see what previous students have to say about the profile assignment?
Tips for profile assignment
Here are some links that can be helpful for your research for profile assignment
http://www.purdue.edu/
http://www.purdueexponent.org/
http://www.lib.purdue.edu/
http://www.purdue.edu/DataDigest/
http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage
Public Document
What do colors represent?
Design Plan
Fonts
tips from former students
Tips
Links
Purdue OWL visual rhetoric
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/Visual_Rhetoric.pdf
Purdue OWL color theory
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/715/01/
Purdue Owl Rhetorical situation
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/625/01/
Color in Motion by Maria Claudia Cortes
http://www.mariaclaudiacortes.com/#
Useful links from Little Brown
http://wps.ablongman.com/long_aaron_lbch_6/45/11773/3013913.cw/index.htm...
Useful Links from CDA
http://wps.ablongman.com/long_wysocki_cda_1/43/11016/2820281.cw/index.ht...
Purdue Student Organizations
https://vwave-03.itap.purdue.edu/cgi-bin/relay.exe/80D21D4D-8AF/launch/1...
Purdue Data Digest for statistics related to Purdue University
http://www.purdue.edu/DataDigest/
HIV stops with me commercial Disclaimer: Do not open it if you feel uncomfortable with sexual content.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=o_EZ-VYJUUY&feature=related
Sexy Porsche commercial Disclaimer: Do not open it if you feel uncomfortable with sexual content.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=W9VsGjXkHeg
Global warming commercial
http://youtube.com/watch?v=s-_LBXWMCAM
visual design
Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliographies
Definitions
A bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, websites, periodicals, etc.) one has used for researching a topic. Bibliographies are sometimes called "references" or "works cited" depending on the style format you are using. A bibliography usually just includes the bibliographic information (i.e., the author, title, publisher, etc.).
An annotation is a summary and/or evaluation.
Therefore, an annotated bibliography includes a summary and/or evaluation of each of the sources. Depending on your project or the assignment, your annotations may do one or more of the following:
Summarize: Some annotations merely summarize the source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is.
Assess: After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is it this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?
Reflect: Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic?
Your annotated bibliography may include some of these, all of these, or even others. If you're doing this for a class, you should get specific guidelines from your instructor.
Why should I write an annotated bibliography?
To learn about your topic: Writing an annotated bibliography is excellent preparation for a research project. Just collecting sources for a bibliography is useful, but when you have to write annotations for each source, you're forced to read each source more carefully. You begin to read more critically instead of just collecting information. At the professional level, annotated bibliographies allow you to see what has been done in the literature and where your own research or scholarship can fit. To help you formulate a thesis: Every good research paper is an argument. The purpose of research is to state and support a thesis. So a very important part of research is developing a thesis that is debatable, interesting, and current. Writing an annotated bibliography can help you gain a good perspective on what is being said about your topic. By reading and responding to a variety of sources on a topic, you'll start to see what the issues are, what people are arguing about, and you'll then be able to develop your own point of view.
To help other researchers: Extensive and scholarly annotated bibliographies are sometimes published. They provide a comprehensive overview of everything important that has been and is being said about that topic. You may not ever get your annotated bibliography published, but as a researcher, you might want to look for one that has been published about your topic.
Format
The format of an annotated bibliography can vary, so if you're doing one for a class, it's important to ask for specific guidelines.
The bibliographic information: Generally, though, the bibliographic information of the source (the title, author, publisher, date, etc.) is written in either MLA or APA format.
The annotations: The annotations for each source are written in paragraph form. The lengths of the annotations can vary significantly from a couple of sentences to a couple of pages. The length will depend on the purpose. If you're just writing summaries of your sources, the annotations may not be very long. However, if you are writing an extensive analysis of each source, you'll need more space.
You can focus your annotations for your own needs. A few sentences of general summary followed by several sentences of how you can fit the work into your larger paper or project can serve you well when you go to draft.
from Purdue Online Writing Lab
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/01/
Research Question
Developing a research question
http://www.dacc.cc.il.us/library/OnlineModules/RschQuest.htm
Issue: What is the issue, and what is your stand on it?
Problem: What is the problem, and what solution are you proposing?
Public question: What situation do we face, and how should we respond?
Academic question: What is the phenomenon, and what is your analysis and interpretation of it?
A good thesis statement
Read for the most important ideas and information
Make sure that you understand clearly
Reread to identify the major sections (outline) and the design plan elements
Summarize each section of the source in a single sentence
Encapsulate the entire passage in a single sentence that captures its main points or conclusion
Combine your section summaries with your overall summary
Check for accuracy and focus on presenting the source’s content and avoid speculating on its line of reasoning
USE YOUR OWN WORDS
Revise
Tips for summarizing sources
http://www.class.uidaho.edu/adv_tech_wrt/resources/general/how_to_summar...
Colorado State University Writing Guides
Overview: Summarizing Source Material
Summarizing a single source or a collection of related sources can provide your reader with background or supporting information that helps them better understand your chosen topic. It is also a useful method to point out material that either supports or contradicts your argument while not distracting your reader with irrelevant details.
As with quoting and paraphrasing, you must document the sources you summarize. Unlike a paraphrase, which rewords a specific passage and often remains the same length as the original, a summary reduces the material into a more concise statement. To be effective you must choose your words carefully, being accurate, objective, focused and concise.
Once you fully understand the intended meaning conveyed by the source material, write your summary. Pay close attention to the precise meaning of the words you choose and be especially careful not to introduce new ideas.
Developing critical reading skills will help you examine source materials with an eye toward what to include in a summary.
http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/researchsources/includingsources/sum...
Being Accurate
Being accurate requires that you fully understand the ideas and information presented in your source material. Misunderstanding an author's tone of voice or misinterpreting the information he or she has extrapolated from numerical data, for instance, may cause you to inadvertently misrepresent their point of view, ideas, opinions or position.
Example:
http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/researchsources/includingsources/sum...
Being Objective
Being objective is as important as being accurate. It's a matter of fairness. Interjecting personal opinions into the ideas or information in your summary confuses the reader buy obscuring the information in the original source material. Expressing your attitude toward it, whether negative or positive, is inappropriate and self-serving.
You may express your own opinions, of course, but that should be done in the surrounding comments framing your summary. Bear in mind, being respectful is simply a matter of good form when arguing a difference of opinion.
Example:
http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/researchsources/includingsources/sum...
Being Focused
Being focused means not wandering off-topic. Stick to what's important. A good summary highlights only those facts, ideas, opinions, etc., that are useful in helping your reader understand the topic being presented. Avoid a detailed account of the minutia contained in your source material.
Including minute details hinders the reader's ability to understand why the summarized information is relevant to your document in the first place and can lead them to conclude that you may not fully understand your topic.
Example:
http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/researchsources/includingsources/sum...
Being Concise
Being concise means being as brief as possible. Details, examples and descriptions contained in the original source material should be removed, as well as information repeated or rephrased in slightly varying ways.
The whole idea of a summary is to be direct and to get to the point. Being focused, objective and accurate will go along way toward achieving this goal.
Example:
http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/researchsources/includingsources/sum...
A tutorial from the University of Waikato
http://www.waikato.ac.nz/library/learning/wise/evaluating/index4.shtml
From Queens University Library website
http://library.queensu.ca/inforef/strategyche.htm
Purpose
Why was the resource written? Was the author's purpose to inform, persuade, or to refute a particular idea or point of view?
Audience
Is the resource intended for the general public, scholars, professionals,etc.
Authority
What are the author's qualifications? Consider author's educational background, past writings and experience. Is the author associated with an organization or institution? Who is the publisher? Are they well known? Does any group control the publishing company?
Accuracy
Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can be usually verified. Opinions evolve from the interpretation of facts. Are the author's conclusions or facts supported with references?
Timeliness
When was the information published? Is the date of publication appropriate for your topic?
Coverage
Is it relevant to your topic? Is the topic covered in depth, partially or is it an broad overview? Does the resource add new information, update other sources or substantiate other resources that you have consulted?
Objectivity
Does the author present multiple viewpoints or is it biased? How do critical reviews rate the work?
from http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/onlib/annotated_bib.html
Questions to Consider
You need to consider carefully the texts that you select for your annotated bibliography. Keep the following questions in mind to help clarify your choices.
What topic/ problem am I investigating?
What question(s) am I exploring? Identify the aim of your literature research.
What kind of material am I looking at and why? Am I looking for journal articles, reports, policies or primary historical data?
Am I being judicious in my selection of texts? Does each text relate to my research topic and assignment requirements?
What are the essential or key texts on my topic? Am I finding them? Are the sources valuable or often referred to in other texts?
For more Core Tutorial evaluating sources
http://gemini.lib.purdue.edu/core/
Was this source helpful to you? How? If not, why?
How does it help you shape your argument?
How can you use this source in your research project?
Has it changed how you think about your topic?
Signal Phrases
Author is neutral
Comments, describes, explains, illustrates, notes, observes, points out, records, relates reports, sees, thinks, writes
Author infers or suggests
Analyzes, asks, assesses, concludes, considers, finds, predicts, proposes, reveals, shows, speculates, suggests, supposes
Author argues
Claims, contends, defends, holds, insists, maintains
Author agrees
Admits, agrees, concedes, grants
Author is uneasy or disparaging belittles, bemoans, complains, condemns, deplores, deprecates, derides, laments, warns
For more visit
the attachment below is from http://unilearning.uow.edu.au/reading/2b.html
peer review questions for the annotated bibliography
from http://www.lc.unsw.edu.au/onlib/annotated_bib.html
(1) Trevor, C.O., Lansford, B. and Black, J.W., 2004, ‘Employee turnover and job performance: monitoring the influences of salary growth and promotion’, Journal of Armchair Psychology, vol 113, no.1, pp. 56-64.
(2.) In this article Trevor et al. review the influences of pay and job opportunities in respect to job performance, turnover rates and employee motivation. (3) The authors use data gained through organisational surveys of blue-chip companies in Vancouver, Canada to try to identify the main causes of employee turnover and whether it is linked to salary growth. (4) Their research focuses on assessing a range of pay structures such as pay for performance and organisational reward schemes. (5) The article is useful to my research topic, as Trevor et al. suggest that there are numerous reasons for employee turnover and variances in employee motivation and performance. (6) The main limitation of the article is that the survey sample was restricted to mid-level management, (7) thus the authors indicate that further, more extensive, research needs to be undertaken to develop a more in-depth understanding of employee turnover and job performance. (8 ) This article will not form the basis of my research; however it will be useful supplementary information for my research on pay structures.
(1) Citation
(2) Introduction
(3) Aims & Research methods
(4) Scope
(5) Usefulness (to your research/ to a particular topic)
(6) Limitations
(7) Conclusions
(8 ) Reflection (explain how this work illuminates your topic or how it will fit in with your research)
Plagiarism
http://education.indiana.edu/~frick/plagiarism/item1.html
http://plagiarism.arts.cornell.edu/tutorial/principles.cfm
Purdue Academic Integrity
http://www.purdue.edu/odos/osrr/integrity.htm
The Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL)
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/
The Purdue Online Writing Lab -evaluating sources
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/printable/553/
Purdue University Libraries CORE tutorial
http://gemini.lib.purdue.edu/core/
Google scholar
http://scholar.google.com/
Purdue Libraries
http://www.lib.purdue.edu/
Sources you can find information about Purdue
Purdue News Service
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/
Purdue Exponent
http://www.purdueexponent.org/
Purdue Data Digest
http://www.purdue.edu/DataDigest/
Journal and Courier
http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage
APA Formating and Style Guide
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
MLA Formating and Style Guide
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/557/01/
Research Paper
1) How can I support an argument?
You can use the following or a combination of them to support an argument.
1. facts
2. statistics
3. testimony by experts
4. anecdotes by people involved
5. scenarios
6. case studies and observation
7. textual evidence from other sources
8. examples
2) How can I organize my paper?
Argumentative papers are usually organized as:
1. introduction (introduce the issue, explain why it is important or why you are writing on this topic, provide some background information, thesis statement)
2. Give first argument with support
3. Give second reason with support
4. Give as many reasons as you need with support
5. Acknowledge and/or refute other arguments
6. Conclusion ( a call to action,a restatement of your thesis, a statement of implications, an overview of the arguments you have made)
OR
1. introduction (introduce the issue, explain why it is important or why you are writing on this topic, provide some background information, thesis statement)
2. Give first argument with support and acknowledge or refute counter arguments related to this reason
3. Give second reason with support and acknowledge or refute counter arguments related to this reason
4. Give as many reasons as you need with support and acknowledge or refute counter arguments related to these reasons
6. Conclusion ( a call to action,a restatement of your thesis, a statement of implications, an overview of the arguments you have made)
Purdue Online writing lab has a very detailed site for writing research papers. I encourage you to visit the website and search research paper
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/
APA Formating and Style Guide
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
APA research paper sample
http://www.dianahacker.com/pdfs/Hacker-Shaw-APA.pdf
MLA Formating and Style Guide
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/557/01/
MLA research paper sample
http://dianahacker.com/pdfs/Hacker-Daly-MLA.pdf
Online Exercises
http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0072873469/student_view0/avoiding_...
http://faculty.goucher.edu/writingprogram/sgarrett/plage1.asp
Signal Phrases
Author is neutral
Comments, describes, explains, illustrates, notes, observes, points out, records, relates reports, sees, thinks, writes
Author infers or suggests
Analyzes, asks, assesses, concludes, considers, finds, predicts, proposes, reveals, shows, speculates, suggests, supposes
Author argues
Claims, contends, defends, holds, insists, maintains
Author agrees
Admits, agrees, concedes, grants
Author is uneasy or disparaging belittles, bemoans, complains, condemns, deplores, deprecates, derides, laments, warns
For more visit
All course handouts, guides, and readings can be found here.
"You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club." Jack London
Hi everyone,
Since I realized that discussing literature is a new experience for you, I decided to provide you a handout which one of my colleagues David Callahan prepared for his class. I hope this helps you in class and and in the future.
Reflections
How I use Facebook
Ways I embrace my audience
A community I love
Technology that empowers me
How I find blogging ideas
Somebody has to say it
Books I want to write
If I were a television producer
what I spend money on
How I use my website
Book shopping-Buy these books
Ten guilty pleasures
When I feel frustrated
Friends I can't wait to see
Facebook applications I love
Media Topics that need more coverage
Handling critics
How to survive college
Downtime-what do I do to recharge
Shaking things up
What I learned this week
If I had the chance what I would say to my 10 year old self
If I had the chance what would I say to my 30 year old self
Things that I regret
Things that I am proud of
Who I want to be in 5/10/20 years
My favorite band/music/instrument/sport/TV show etc.
Things that i cannot live without
New Concepts
Rhetorical Situation Concepts:
Design Plan
Audience:
Purpose:
Context:
Medium:
Strategies:
Arrangement:
Testing:
Writing Process Concepts
Freewriting: Writing without stopping for a certain amount of time.
Brainstorming: listing every idea and detail that comes to your mind.
Clustering a type of freewriting and brainstorming which draws on free association and unedited work by combining writing and nonlinear drawing.
Asking Questions: Asking yourself a set of questions about a subject and then writing out the answers
Revising:
Editing:
Proofreading:
Peer review:
Literary Concepts
Character: Any representation of an individual being presented in a dramatic or narrative work through extended dramatic or verbal representation.
Climax: The critical point in the story which changes the course of events or the point in the story where the main character faces a crisis and must make a crucial decision that will effect the outcome of the story.
Description: Description details the sensory qualities of a person, scene, thing, or feeling using concrete and specific words to convey a dominant mood, illustrate an idea, or achieve some other purpose.
Dialogue: The lines spoken by a character or characters in a play, essay, story, or novel, especially a conversation between two characters, or a literary work that takes the form of such a discussion (e.g., Plato's Republic). Bad dialogue is pointless. Good dialogue either provides characterization or advances the plot.
Flashback: A break in the continuity of a story to introduce an earlier event
Foreshadow: A hint or clue to future events in the story
Metaphor: A comparison or analogy stated in such a way as to imply that one object is another one, figuratively speaking. When we speak of "the ladder of success," we imply that being successful is much like climbing a ladder to a higher and better position.
Plot: The structure and relationship of actions and events in a work of fiction. In order for a plot to begin, some sort of catalyst is necessary. While the temporal order of events in the work constitutes the "story," we are speaking of plot rather than story as soon as we look at how these events relate to one another and how they are rendered and organized so as to achieve their particular effects.
Point of View: The way a story gets told and who tells it. It is the method of narration that determines the position, or angle of vision, from which the story unfolds. Point of view governs the reader's access to the story. Many narratives appear in the first person (the narrator speaks as "I" and the narrator is a character in the story who may or may not influence events within it). Another common type of narrative is the third-person narrative (the narrator seems to be someone standing outside the story who refers to all the characters by name or as he, she, they, and so on).
Setting: The general locale, historical time, and social circumstances in which the action of a fictional or dramatic work occurs; the setting of an episode or scene within a work is the particular physical location in which it takes place.
Simile: An analogy or comparison implied by using an adverb such as like or as, in contrast with a metaphor which figuratively makes the comparison by stating outright that one thing is another thing.
Literacy Narrative Peer Review
You will be graded on the comments and suggestions you make. So please make sure that you make at least two specific suggestions for the author so that s/he can improve his/her narrative and do not forget to make positive comments. Do not forget to write your name on the paper you review. I expect to see some changes from the first draft to the final draft.
Reviewer:
Writer:
Specific Suggestions
Checklist for revision
Purpose
What is the essay’s purpose? Does it conform to the assignment? Is it consistent throughout the paper? (See pp. 6–8.)
Thesis
What is the thesis of the essay? Where does it become clear? How well do thesis and paper match: Does the paper stray from the thesis? Does it fulfill the commitment of the thesis? (See pp. 14–16.)
Structure
What are the main points of the paper? (List them.) How well does each support the thesis? How effective is their arrangement for the paper’s purpose? (See pp. 17–21.)
Development
How well do details, examples, and other evidence support each main point? Where, if at all, might readers find support skimpy or have trouble understanding the content? (See pp. 6–7, 45–49.)
Tone
What is the tone of the paper? How do particular words and sentence structures create the tone? How appropriate is it for the purpose, topic, and intended readers? Where is it most and least successful?
Unity
What does each sentence and paragraph contribute to the thesis?
Where, if at all, do digressions occur? Should these be cut, or can they be rewritten to support the thesis? (See pp. 20–21, 39–40.)
Coherence
How clearly and smoothly does the paper flow? Where does it seem rough or awkward? Can any transitions be improved? (See pp. 20–21, 40–44.)
Title, introduction, conclusion
How accurately and interestingly does the title reflect the essay’s content? (See below.) How well does the introduction engage and focus readers’ attention? (See pp. 50–51.) How effective is the conclusion in providing a sense of completion? (See pp. 51–53.)
Checklist for editing
Clarity
How well do words and sentences convey their intended meanings?
Which if any words and sentences are confusing? Check especially for these:
Exact language (3 pp. 167–75)
Parallelism (3 pp. 152–55)
Clear modifiers (4 pp. 271–77)
Clear reference of pronouns (4 pp. 256–59)
Complete sentences (4 pp. 278–82)
Sentences separated correctly (4 pp. 283–87)
Effectiveness
How well do words and sentences engage and focus readers? Where does the writing seem wordy, choppy, or dull? Check especially for these:
Emphasis of main ideas (3 pp. 141–50)
Smooth and informative transitions (pp. 43–45)
Variety in sentence length and structure (3 pp. 156–59)
Appropriate language (3 pp. 160–66)
Concise sentences (3 pp. 177–82)
Correctness
How little or how much do surface errors interfere with clarity and effectiveness? Check especially for these:
Spelling (6 pp. 345–51)
Verb forms, especially -s and -ed endings and correct forms of irregular verbs (4 pp. 210–24)
Verb tenses, especially consistency (4 pp. 225–31)
Agreement between subjects and verbs, especially when words come between them or the subject is each, everyone, or a similar word (4 pp. 237–42)
Pronoun forms (4 pp. 244–50)
Agreement between pronouns and antecedents, especially when the antecedent contains or or it is everyone, person, or a similar word (4 pp. 251–54)
Sentence fragments (4 pp. 278–82)
Commas, especially with comma splices (4 pp. 283–87) and with and or but, with introductory elements, with nonessential elements, and with series (5 pp. 298–308)
Apostrophes in possessives but not plural nouns (Dave’s/witches) and in contractions but not possessive personal pronouns (it’s/its) (5 p. 327)
The thesis statement
To add or show sequence
again, also, and, and then, besides, equally important, finally, first, further, furthermore, in addition, in the first place, last, moreover, next, second, still, too
To compare
also, in the same way, likewise, similarly
To contrast
although, and yet, but, but at the same time, despite, even so, even though, for all that, however, in contrast, in spite of, nevertheless, notwithstanding, on the contrary, on the other hand, regardless, still, though, yet
To give examples or intensify
after all, an illustration of, even, for example, for instance, indeed, in fact, it is true, of course, specifically, that is, to illustrate, truly
To indicate place
above, adjacent to, below, elsewhere, farther on, here, near, nearby, on the other side, opposite to, there, to the east, to the left
To indicate time
after a while, afterward, as long as, as soon as, at last, at length, at that time, before, earlier, formerly, immediately, in the meantime, in the past, lately, later, meanwhile, now, presently, shortly, simultaneously, since, so far, soon, subsequently, then, thereafter, until, until now, when
To repeat, summarize, or conclude
all in all, altogether, as has been said, in brief, in conclusion, in other words, in particular, in short, in simpler terms, in summary, on the whole, that is, therefore, to put it differently, to summarize
Useful links
Purdue University
http://www.purdue.edu/
Purdue Academic Calendar
http://www.purdue.edu/Registrar/InteralOps/Calendars/Academic/2007-2008....
Purdue Directory
http://www.purdue.edu/purdue/directories/
Purdue Regulations
http://www.purdue.edu/univregs/
Purdue Academic Integrity
http://www.purdue.edu/odos/osrr/integrity.htm
The Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL)
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/
Dean of Students
http://www.purdue.edu/ODOS/
Digital Learning Collaboratory
http://dlc.purdue.edu/
Purdue Libraries
http://www.lib.purdue.edu/
ITAP Information Technology at Purdue
http://www.itap.purdue.edu/
ICAP Introductory Composition at Purdue
http://www.digitalparlor.org/icap/
The Exponent
http://www.purdueexponent.org/
The Little Brown Compact Handbook with exercises
http://wps.ablongman.com/long_aaron_lbch_6/
Compose design Advocate
http://wps.ablongman.com/long_wysocki_cda_1/