The rhetorical process of digital subjectivities: Case studies of international teaching assistants negotiating identity with digital media
Kevin Eric DePew
- School: Purdue University (0183)
- Degree: Ph.D.
- Date: 2003; pp: 310
- Advisor: Sullivan, Patricia
- Source: DAI-A 65/03, p. 915, Sep 2004
- Subjects: Language, Rhetoric And Composition (0681); Education, Bilingual And Multicultural (0282); Education, Technology (0710)
- ProQuest Document Number:
- ISBN: 0-496-71448-9
- UMI Number: AAT 3124140
Abstract:
-
In the absence of an articulated process for composing one's digital subjectivity,
scholars have relied on corporate and artistic tropes to support their arguments about
various technologies' egalitarian potential. By using these tropes, these scholars actually
undermine their goals of empowering users, especially marked individuals, because they
reify unreasonable expectations. As an alternative to these tropes, three heuristics have
been developed as a possible foundation for computer users' digital subjectivity
composing process: (1) having knowledge of the social ideology, (2) having knowledge
of computer use and conventions, (3) understanding how the ideological design
of the technology prescribes users' subjectivity. The viability of these heuristics
is examined in the context of English Composition courses taught in computer-mediated
classrooms by international teaching assistants (ITAs). To test this viability I posed
the questions: (1) why do ITAs need compensatory strategies to manage the rhetorical
situation of the classroom? (2) what effect does computer technologies have on this
rhetorical situation? and (3) what appropriate technological practices should ITAs use
to manage the American classroom? As a means of giving the ITA participants agency in
the epistemological process--something that has absent from many studies about ITAs--the
study has been designed using postcritical research methods. This data collection includes:
(1) interviews with the ITAs, (2) observations of the classroom (or rhetorical context),
(3) collection of public documents (i.e., web pages, emails, PowerPoint presentations,
online conferencing transcripts) shared between the ITAs and their students, and (4)
questionnaires designed to learn how the student audience responded to their ITAs. From
this study we learn that not all ITAs need compensatory strategies and this need is not
entirely predictable. Furthermore, the technology, rather than empowering the instructors,
became another factor that affected how their audience perceived them. As a result,
the first two heuristics (i.e., social knowledge and technological knowledge) proved
to be viable. Although participants' digital subjectivity composing process did not
include the third heuristic (i.e., reading the ideological design of the technology),
we should still consider exploring the effects of this strategy in future studies.
Dissertations
We post the dissertation abstracts
our graduates enter into ProQuest's
database of Dissertations and Theses (and link to 24-page previews as available).
Those at Purdue can locate the full texts through the Purdue Library.