This report still looks a lot like it did before. While you have good data, the write-up could use some work; there's definitely room for improvement in the report itself. Here are some suggestions:

1. Make it clear at the beginning that you did a usability study of the OSDDP website and are reporting your results. That's not really mentioned until pgh 4.

2. I agree with Alex and Becky to better define the study. Maybe you could have a short section called Methods that says you did a survey and interviewed Charlie.

3. Your report should respond to Charlie's email... show that you have read it and thought about it.

4. The first sentence talks about suggestions. What are they? WHERE are they? I think you need a conclusion that lists your recommendations.

5. I agree with Joe et. al. to consider front matter like a title page and a table of contents. Also, what about an abstract? or executive summary?

The report is layed out in a very easy to understand format. I liked how the question that was asked was put in the bar graph. One thing I didn't see was a correlation between a persons interests and their computer skills. Overall, looks good

The document looks really good. Its structured well, and all the graphs are clear and explained. It has a lot of content; my only suggestion to you is to maybe add a table of contents and a cover page, that would really give you document a professional look.
Good job.
Chirs Neil Rachel Joe

Everything seemed pretty in depth and precise, the only suggestion that cam up was formmatting the section where you talk about the questions into a Q/A format rather than paragraphing.

I took a quick look at your task list and it seems to be logical to me. One thing that I would recommend was to add more detail, such as who you will make the survey for (audience).

Good start-- clearly numbered and subdivided, with good beginning and end steps. It's a nice idea to include both positives and negatives-- that shows rhetorical savvy!

As we said in class, it's a good idea to move it out of the worksheet into its own file.

Some other suggestions:
1. Include usability testing in your task list.

2. Don't specify that the final report should be split up among group members, because a different group might decide to use a different collaborative writing model. Maybe you could say something like: "decide how to draft report as a group-- divide up, cowrite, etc."

grumpy p.s. about the OSDDP's usability : It would be nice if the issues part of this OSDDP site also listed page numbers up top. It is a pain to scroll all the way down p. 1 if you KNOW the issue you want to read is on p. 2.

Well expained document. It would be better if you combine tasklist and schedule.

Amaan

Everything looks great guys.