bobosis @ Mon, 02/20/2006 - 17:20
| Project: | OSDDP Project |
| Component: | Documentation |
| Category: | task |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | psexson |
| Status: | active |
| Attachment: | White Paper Proposal.doc (21.5 KB) |
Description
The project we will be dealing with is regarding on-line gaming and how it can be benefited by using open source. On-line gaming has a wide spectrum of users across the globe. Many could add programs to an on-line game that would hopefully only benefit the company. We plan to discuss this benefit and show how it will be produce a positive outcome for many companies.
Dustin F
Heather U
Stacey W
Updates
| #1 submitted by swaybe00 on Thu, 03/02/2006 - 22:18 | ||||||
| ||||||
| #2 submitted by swaybe00 on Wed, 03/08/2006 - 18:04 | ||||||
| ||||||
Attached you will find our group’s first draft of our white paper. It took a lot of hard work and time, but we feel that it is a strong first draft. However, I am sure like everything else in life there is room for improvement. Probably more than we even realize seeing how it is our first draft. So please feel free to as brutally honest as possible to help us improve upon our document. Our audience is software companies who are looking for a solution to the problems they have been unintentionally been releasing within their software. At this time we do not have specific plans for further development, but I am sure after some help from peer evaluation we will be given some guidance. | ||||||
| #3 submitted by swaybe00 on Tue, 03/28/2006 - 19:46 | ||||||
| ||||||
Attached you will find draft two of our white paper on online gaming. Draft two of our white paper has been through many changes since our last submission. During this revision, my group and I have not only cut the amount of our original word, but we have also added to the content. To the text, we have brought the open source element to our paper in order to meet the requirements of the assignment. Next, we worked on showing our specific position in this white paper. We accomplished this through the discussion and analysis we have added to the paper. We thought that our position was clear but after reading Professor Clark’s comments, we realized we really needed to show it and not just assume the audience knew where we stood through the information we presented. I would like to thank everyone who evaluated our paper. My group and I feel that all the comments helped to improve our original paper and we are very happy this new draft that we are turning in. Stacey, Heather, and Dustin P.S. Also below is an updated description of our project. Description: The project we will be dealing with is regarding on-line gaming and how it can be benefited by using open source. On-line gaming has a wide spectrum of users across the globe. Many companies could add to their program if they take advantage of the technology of open source during testing. We plan to discuss this benefit and show a way around problem companies have with this method of testing. We hope to show how it will produce a positive outcome for many companies. This paper would be of interest to not only companies but to online gamers who want to know what is being done to solve the problem in the games they love. Dustin F | ||||||
| #4 submitted by swaybe00 on Tue, 03/28/2006 - 20:53 | ||||||
| ||||||
For some reason, my original PDF file will not open so I am going to attach all this information again. Sorry for the inconvenience. Attached you will find draft two of our white paper on online gaming. Draft two of our white paper has been through many changes since our last submission. During this revision, my group and I have not only cut the amount of our original word, but we have also added to the content. To the text, we have brought the open source element to our paper in order to meet the requirements of the assignment. Next, we worked on showing our specific position in this white paper. We accomplished this through the discussion and analysis we have added to the paper. We thought that our position was clear but after reading Professor Clark’s comments, we realized we really needed to show it and not just assume the audience knew where we stood through the information we presented. I would like to thank everyone who evaluated our paper. My group and I feel that all the comments helped to improve our original paper and we are very happy this new draft that we are turning in. Stacey, Heather, and Dustin P.S. Also below is an updated description of our project. Description: The project we will be dealing with is regarding on-line gaming and how it can be benefited by using open source. On-line gaming has a wide spectrum of users across the globe. Many companies could add to their program if they take advantage of the technology of open source during testing. We plan to discuss this benefit and show a way around problem companies have with this method of testing. We hope to show how it will produce a positive outcome for many companies. This paper would be of interest to not only companies but to online gamers who want to know what is being done to solve the problem in the games they love. Dustin F | ||||||
| #5 submitted by swaybe00 on Tue, 03/28/2006 - 21:02 | ||||||
| ||||||
Okay. Try 3. I still can not get the file I need to attach to open so I am going to try and attach it as a doc. I hope this works. If not I will be contacting Professor Clark. Again, I am sorry for the inconvenience. Hopefully, it goes through better this way. Attached you will find draft two of our white paper on online gaming. Draft two of our white paper has been through many changes since our last submission. During this revision, my group and I have not only cut the amount of our original word, but we have also added to the content. To the text, we have brought the open source element to our paper in order to meet the requirements of the assignment. Next, we worked on showing our specific position in this white paper. We accomplished this through the discussion and analysis we have added to the paper. We thought that our position was clear but after reading Professor Clark’s comments, we realized we really needed to show it and not just assume the audience knew where we stood through the information we presented. I would like to thank everyone who evaluated our paper. My group and I feel that all the comments helped to improve our original paper and we are very happy this new draft that we are turning in. Stacey, Heather, and Dustin P.S. Also below is an updated description of our project. Description: The project we will be dealing with is regarding on-line gaming and how it can be benefited by using open source. On-line gaming has a wide spectrum of users across the globe. Many companies could add to their program if they take advantage of the technology of open source during testing. We plan to discuss this benefit and show a way around problem companies have with this method of testing. We hope to show how it will produce a positive outcome for many companies. This paper would be of interest to not only companies but to online gamers who want to know what is being done to solve the problem in the games they love. Dustin F | ||||||
| #6 submitted by swaybe00 on Tue, 04/25/2006 - 14:37 | ||||||
| ||||||
Our group has made many drastic changes to this white paper since it was last posted on the OSDDP site. We feel that these changes have greatly improved it and are looking forward to any further suggestions that will help to improve upon our document. Thanks! | ||||||
| #7 submitted by swaybe00 on Tue, 04/25/2006 - 14:41 | ||||||
Here is our revised draft in PDF instead of doc for those who prefer it in this format. Thanks | ||||||
| #8 submitted by swaybe00 on Tue, 04/25/2006 - 14:45 | ||||||
| ||||||
Here is our revised draft in PDF instead of doc for those who prefer this formating. I forgot to attach it to the last message I sent. Sorry. It has been through drastic changes that we, as a group, feel have only improved upon the document. We are looking forward to all suggestion anyone may have. Thanks! | ||||||
| #9 submitted by swaybe00 on Mon, 05/01/2006 - 10:50 | ||||||
| ||||||
Attached you will find our final version of our white paper. We have removed some of the less informal discussion to make it less distracting to our audience. Thanks! | ||||||
| #10 submitted by psexson on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 17:09 | ||||||
| ||||||
| #11 submitted by psexson on Wed, 10/18/2006 - 17:12 | ||||||
|